03.13.01
Boundary Protection
Apply boundary protection to protect system boundaries, communications, cryptography, shared resources, and sessions for CPCSC Level 2 readiness.
Last updated June 25, 2026
Apply information in shared system resources to protect system boundaries, communications, cryptography, shared resources, and sessions for CPCSC Level 2 readiness. This guide separates the official ITSP.10.171 control language from practical implementation, evidence, auditor questions, and related controls.
Official ITSP.10.171 wording for 03.13.04. Use the Cyber Centre publication and contract requirements as the source of truth for certification, assessment, or procurement submissions.
Contains information sourced from Government of Canada material used under the Open Government Licence - Canada.
Information in Shared System Resources is part of the CPCSC Level 2 System and communications protection family. This is about protecting how systems communicate: boundaries, encryption, shared resources, collaborative tools, mobile code, and session integrity.
For a founder, CISO, engineer, or compliance owner, the practical question is whether information in shared system resources is visible in real operating evidence: a setting, workflow, ticket, log, approval, review, or exception record that can survive an external assessment.
Level 2 is different from Level 1 because the evidence has to survive an external assessment. A policy statement helps, but the stronger answer is a record that shows who did the work, when it ran, what system setting or workflow enforced it, and how exceptions were handled.
Define the in-scope systems, owners, users, vendors, and data flows affected by information in shared system resources.
Document architecture, enforce boundary rules, protect data in transit and storage, manage cryptography, and restrict risky communication paths.
Translate the formal requirement into one or two operating procedures: who performs it, how often, where it is recorded, and who approves exceptions.
Configure the relevant systems so the control is enforced by identity, endpoint, cloud, network, ticketing, monitoring, vendor, or documentation workflows rather than memory.
Keep evidence in a consistent folder, GRC system, ticket queue, or audit workspace so an assessor can trace the control from requirement to implementation to review.
Information in Shared System Resources: network architecture diagram.
Information in Shared System Resources: firewall or security group rules.
Information in Shared System Resources: encryption settings.
Information in Shared System Resources: key management records.
Information in Shared System Resources: session controls.
Information in Shared System Resources: collaboration tool settings.
Information in Shared System Resources: owner assignment and review cadence.
Information in Shared System Resources: exception, remediation, or POA&M records when the control is not fully implemented.
Where is information in shared system resources implemented in the in-scope environment?
Who owns information in shared system resources, and how do they know it is operating?
Show the evidence that proves information in shared system resources ran during the assessment period.
What happens when information in shared system resources fails, is bypassed, or has an exception?
How does this control connect to the system security plan, risk register, POA&M, and related CPCSC controls?
Formal control language is sourced from the Canadian Centre for Cyber Security ITSP.10.171 publication. CPCSC Level 2 assessment context references the Government of Canada CPCSC program overview and ITSP.10.171-01 assessment guidance.
CPCSC Program OverviewITSP.10.171ITSP.10.171-01Open Government Licence - Canada