CPCSC Level 2 Control

Last updated June 25, 2026

03.03.02Audit and accountability

CPCSC Level 2 03.03.02: Audit Record Content

Apply audit record content to produce reliable logs and review routines that show what happened in the environment for CPCSC Level 2 readiness. This guide separates the official ITSP.10.171 control language from practical implementation, evidence, auditor questions, and related controls.

Formal Control Language

Official ITSP.10.171 wording for 03.03.02. Use the Cyber Centre publication and contract requirements as the source of truth for certification, assessment, or procurement submissions.

  • Include the following content in audit records: what type of event occurred
  • when the event occurred
  • where the event occurred
  • source of the event
  • outcome of the event
  • identity of individuals, subjects, objects, or entities associated with the event
  • Provide additional information for audit records, as needed

Contains information sourced from Government of Canada material used under the Open Government Licence - Canada.

What This Means In Plain English

Audit Record Content is part of the CPCSC Level 2 Audit and accountability family. This is about keeping logs that are useful enough to reconstruct security-relevant activity and reviewed often enough to catch issues.

For a founder, CISO, engineer, or compliance owner, the practical question is whether audit record content is visible in real operating evidence: a setting, workflow, ticket, log, approval, review, or exception record that can survive an external assessment.

Level 2 is different from Level 1 because the evidence has to survive an external assessment. A policy statement helps, but the stronger answer is a record that shows who did the work, when it ran, what system setting or workflow enforced it, and how exceptions were handled.

How To Implement It

1

Define the in-scope systems, owners, users, vendors, and data flows affected by audit record content.

2

Define events to log, centralize logs where possible, synchronize time, protect logs from tampering, and document alert or review workflows.

3

Translate the formal requirement into one or two operating procedures: who performs it, how often, where it is recorded, and who approves exceptions.

4

Configure the relevant systems so the control is enforced by identity, endpoint, cloud, network, ticketing, monitoring, vendor, or documentation workflows rather than memory.

5

Keep evidence in a consistent folder, GRC system, ticket queue, or audit workspace so an assessor can trace the control from requirement to implementation to review.

Evidence Normally Gathered

Audit Record Content: logging standard.

Audit Record Content: SIEM or log dashboard screenshots.

Audit Record Content: event source inventory.

Audit Record Content: log review tickets.

Audit Record Content: time synchronization settings.

Audit Record Content: log retention settings.

Audit Record Content: owner assignment and review cadence.

Audit Record Content: exception, remediation, or POA&M records when the control is not fully implemented.

Common Auditor Questions

Where is audit record content implemented in the in-scope environment?

Who owns audit record content, and how do they know it is operating?

Show the evidence that proves audit record content ran during the assessment period.

What happens when audit record content fails, is bypassed, or has an exception?

How does this control connect to the system security plan, risk register, POA&M, and related CPCSC controls?

Sources

Source and attribution.

Formal control language is sourced from the Canadian Centre for Cyber Security ITSP.10.171 publication. CPCSC Level 2 assessment context references the Government of Canada CPCSC program overview and ITSP.10.171-01 assessment guidance.

CPCSC Program OverviewITSP.10.171ITSP.10.171-01Open Government Licence - Canada