03.10.01
Physical Access Authorizations
Apply physical access authorizations to protect facilities, work sites, transmission paths, and physical access to systems and media for CPCSC Level 2 readiness.
Last updated June 25, 2026
Apply access control for transmission to protect facilities, work sites, transmission paths, and physical access to systems and media for CPCSC Level 2 readiness. This guide separates the official ITSP.10.171 control language from practical implementation, evidence, auditor questions, and related controls.
Official ITSP.10.171 wording for 03.10.08. Use the Cyber Centre publication and contract requirements as the source of truth for certification, assessment, or procurement submissions.
Contains information sourced from Government of Canada material used under the Open Government Licence - Canada.
Access Control for Transmission is part of the CPCSC Level 2 Physical protection family. This is about making physical access controls match the sensitivity of systems, media, transmission points, and alternate work locations.
For a founder, CISO, engineer, or compliance owner, the practical question is whether access control for transmission is visible in real operating evidence: a setting, workflow, ticket, log, approval, review, or exception record that can survive an external assessment.
Level 2 is different from Level 1 because the evidence has to survive an external assessment. A policy statement helps, but the stronger answer is a record that shows who did the work, when it ran, what system setting or workflow enforced it, and how exceptions were handled.
Define the in-scope systems, owners, users, vendors, and data flows affected by access control for transmission.
Define restricted areas, approve access, monitor entry, control visitors, protect transmission paths, and document alternate work site expectations.
Translate the formal requirement into one or two operating procedures: who performs it, how often, where it is recorded, and who approves exceptions.
Configure the relevant systems so the control is enforced by identity, endpoint, cloud, network, ticketing, monitoring, vendor, or documentation workflows rather than memory.
Keep evidence in a consistent folder, GRC system, ticket queue, or audit workspace so an assessor can trace the control from requirement to implementation to review.
Access Control for Transmission: facility access lists.
Access Control for Transmission: visitor logs.
Access Control for Transmission: badge reports.
Access Control for Transmission: alternate work agreements.
Access Control for Transmission: physical security diagrams.
Access Control for Transmission: transmission path controls.
Access Control for Transmission: owner assignment and review cadence.
Access Control for Transmission: exception, remediation, or POA&M records when the control is not fully implemented.
Where is access control for transmission implemented in the in-scope environment?
Who owns access control for transmission, and how do they know it is operating?
Show the evidence that proves access control for transmission ran during the assessment period.
What happens when access control for transmission fails, is bypassed, or has an exception?
How does this control connect to the system security plan, risk register, POA&M, and related CPCSC controls?
Formal control language is sourced from the Canadian Centre for Cyber Security ITSP.10.171 publication. CPCSC Level 2 assessment context references the Government of Canada CPCSC program overview and ITSP.10.171-01 assessment guidance.
CPCSC Program OverviewITSP.10.171ITSP.10.171-01Open Government Licence - Canada