03.12.02
Plan of Action and Milestones
Apply plan of action and milestones to assess controls, track remediation, monitor effectiveness, and manage information exchanges for CPCSC Level 2 readiness.
Last updated June 25, 2026
Apply security assessment to assess controls, track remediation, monitor effectiveness, and manage information exchanges for CPCSC Level 2 readiness. This guide separates the official ITSP.10.171 control language from practical implementation, evidence, auditor questions, and related controls.
Official ITSP.10.171 wording for 03.12.01. Use the Cyber Centre publication and contract requirements as the source of truth for certification, assessment, or procurement submissions.
Contains information sourced from Government of Canada material used under the Open Government Licence - Canada.
Security Assessment is part of the CPCSC Level 2 Security assessment and monitoring family. This is about proving controls are assessed, gaps are tracked, monitoring continues between assessments, and information exchanges are governed.
For a founder, CISO, engineer, or compliance owner, the practical question is whether security assessment is visible in real operating evidence: a setting, workflow, ticket, log, approval, review, or exception record that can survive an external assessment.
Level 2 is different from Level 1 because the evidence has to survive an external assessment. A policy statement helps, but the stronger answer is a record that shows who did the work, when it ran, what system setting or workflow enforced it, and how exceptions were handled.
Define the in-scope systems, owners, users, vendors, and data flows affected by security assessment.
Maintain an assessment plan, test controls, track POA&M items, monitor control health, and document exchange agreements for specified information.
Translate the formal requirement into one or two operating procedures: who performs it, how often, where it is recorded, and who approves exceptions.
Configure the relevant systems so the control is enforced by identity, endpoint, cloud, network, ticketing, monitoring, vendor, or documentation workflows rather than memory.
Keep evidence in a consistent folder, GRC system, ticket queue, or audit workspace so an assessor can trace the control from requirement to implementation to review.
Security Assessment: assessment plan.
Security Assessment: control test records.
Security Assessment: POA&M.
Security Assessment: continuous monitoring reports.
Security Assessment: information exchange agreements.
Security Assessment: remediation status reports.
Security Assessment: owner assignment and review cadence.
Security Assessment: exception, remediation, or POA&M records when the control is not fully implemented.
Where is security assessment implemented in the in-scope environment?
Who owns security assessment, and how do they know it is operating?
Show the evidence that proves security assessment ran during the assessment period.
What happens when security assessment fails, is bypassed, or has an exception?
How does this control connect to the system security plan, risk register, POA&M, and related CPCSC controls?
Formal control language is sourced from the Canadian Centre for Cyber Security ITSP.10.171 publication. CPCSC Level 2 assessment context references the Government of Canada CPCSC program overview and ITSP.10.171-01 assessment guidance.
CPCSC Program OverviewITSP.10.171ITSP.10.171-01Open Government Licence - Canada